Wiltshire police has released a statement following the first week of The Dawn Sturgess Inquiry, after receiving intense scrutiny during proceedings.
Wiltshire Police Chief Constable Catherine Roper addressed the police mischaracterising Dawn as a "known drug user" and ignoring other emergency services who thought there was another nerve agent incident.
The police chief constable stated: "The Dawn Sturgess Inquiry began in Salisbury last week and, having spent time engaging with our communities, we know that this renewed focus on two such significant incidents has concerned many of you.
"As a result of these conversations, I wanted to provide an update on the Wiltshire Police elements heard so far at the Inquiry.
Read more: Round up of week one of Dawn Sturgess Public Inquiry
"For those of you who attended the hearings or visited Salisbury last week, you would have seen a visible policing presence around the Guildhall. This largely consisted of local, neighbourhood officers who were there to provide help and reassurance.
"I would like to thank each of you who took the time to come and talk to our officers in and around the city centre.
"Nothing arose last week which posed any risk to the public and I would like to reiterate that there remains no intelligence to suggest any cause for concern for those living and working in Salisbury and Amesbury.
"In terms of the Inquiry itself, the initial Wiltshire Police response to the second Novichok poisoning in Amesbury was a central focus of testimonies and evidence presented in the first week.
"The Inquiry heard that Dawn was wrongly described, in Wiltshire Police documents, as a “known drug user” and that officers responding to the incident involving Charlie Rowley hypothesised that this was an illegal drug overdose.
"This was despite concerns being raised by our emergency service colleagues in the ambulance and fire services that this could be another nerve agent incident."
WPCC Roper continued: "In my opening statement to the Inquiry and later by Deputy Chief Constable Paul Mills, who is the corporate witness for Wiltshire Police, we offered an apology to Dawn’s family for her being wrongly characterised in this way.
"Dawn’s family acknowledged this apology in their opening statement, and I hope to have the opportunity to repeat it to them in person at an appropriate time.
"As this is an issue to be further explored by the Inquiry, it would not be appropriate for us to comment on this aspect more at this time.
Read more: Dawn Sturgess Inquiry: Police ignored paramedics in Amesbury
"In terms of wider organisational learning, I wanted to assure you that, in addition to the learning already captured in a national process run by the College of Policing, we are keeping a daily record to capture each opportunity for future learning emanating from the Inquiry and any improvements we can make to the service we deliver.
"Although the Inquiry will now move to London, I appreciate some in our communities might have further questions or concerns.
"I would encourage you all to continue to engage with your Neighbourhood Policing Teams who are there to support you in any way they can."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here